Why going to the doctor is the great Indian nightmare
by Lakshmi Chaudhry
Mar 30, 2012
#Cancer #Healthcare in India #HealthMatters #India #Oncology #ThisIndianLife
More
people die of cancer in India than those in the West. And the mortality
rate is about the same in both rural and urban India, and therefore
unaltered by access to healthcare. AFP
Here’s the bad
news: More people die of cancer in India than those in the West. And the
mortality rate is about the same in both rural and urban India, and
therefore unaltered by access to healthcare.
According to the Times of India, the results of the Million Death Study reveals a uniquely Indian cause for this anomaly:
An Indian peculiarity crops up here. As MDS says that
cancer deaths were two times higher in the least educated than in the
most educated adults, it would follow that educated Indians living in
cities and enjoying better access to cancer care should be able to beat
the disease. But this is clearly not the case. “Women won’t come to
hospitals to show a lump in their breast because it’s not painful. Men
won’t get themselves checked despite losing weight drastically . This is
true in both urban and rural India,” says a senior doctor.
The problem, analyses Dr Shastri, is that greater awareness in urban
areas hasn’t really translated into attitudinal changes. “People in
urban areas, too, visit doctors only when their cancer is advanced .
Therefore, the death rate is high in cities despite the availability of
world-class treatment.”
In other words, Indians are scared cats who prefer to live in denial.
This is certainly one important reason. A friend’s mother hid the lump
in her breast for years out of fear of the disease. Cancer is still
ingrained in the Indian mind as a fatal disease, hence the reasoning:
Why endure brutal chemo sessions only to die after months of additional
suffering. According to
Yuvraj Singh‘s
friends, one reason he preferred to seek treatment in Boston is that
“it isn’t like India where cancer is treated virtually like a death
warrant.” (
See my previous article for more on why Indians are specifically scared of cancer)
The reasons why Indians rarely go to a doctor – whether for cancer or a viral fever – are far more complex. AFP
But the doctors interviewed by
TOI offer at best a partial
truth. The reasons why Indians rarely go to a doctor – whether for
cancer or a viral fever – are far more complex. More importantly, we
also don’t receive proper attention when we do indeed seek medical
attention. Here are three other reasons why I as a layperson think we
fail to get adequate medical care despite “the availability of
world-class treatment.”
One, the disappearing family doctor. When I was a
kid, everything from my father’s fever to my chicken pox to my
sister-in-law’s near miscarriage to my grandfather’s stroke medication
was supervised by Dr Valvade, a matronly doctor who was almost a part of
the family. When things looked a bit serious, she referred us
personally to a specialist who kept her in the loop. She would come
home, see us after-hours, take phone calls early in the morning or late
at night.
Today, any visit to a doctor requires hours in a crowded waiting
room, which is nigh impossible for most busy urban professionals. And
unless you’ve remained in the same city for decades, the chances are the
attention you receive will be prefunctory and minimal. She’s extremely
busy and so are you. The result: the family doctor has been replaced by a
trusted pharmacist. Unless the symptoms look serious, he’s the go-to
guy for most medical ailments.
Where the family doctor was once a family’s unofficial “life guard” –
the one tasked to keep an eye out for potentially life-threatening
symptoms — that responsibility now lies with us. And with the important
exception of our children, we make for poor “life guards” when it comes
to our own health. There’s a “jab tak chalta hai” attitude toward our
own bodies, exacerbated by our hectic work-family schedules and the time
commitment now required to seek medical care.
Two, class matters. My maid goes to the doctor far
more often than I do. Any fever that goes unabated in her family for
more than two days requires a visit to the neighbourhood doc. He
inevitably administers an unnamed injection, and sends her off with a
couple of pills. She’s never informed of the diagnosis, except in the
vaguest terms.
And when she or any of her family members fail to respond to this
one-size-fits-all treatment, she comes to me, as when her son’s “viral
fever” escalated to bronchitis. I took him to my doctor who took one
look at his prescription and declared, “This is junk.”
It is absurd, Dr Shastri, to pretend that all Indians have equal
access to our world class medical community. Most working class Indians
rely on a poorly qualified doctor who can barely diagnose a
run-of-the-mill disease, leave alone cancer.
